Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Still Happy?



GQ, happy, happy, happy.
Sales and exposure are up.
A&E, not so much. 
Neither Storage Wars nor Intervention make a good plush doll or T-shirt.

GLAAD, happy, happy, happy.
Score another “W” for intolerant tolerance.
Conservative groups, not so much. 
Though, be sure, the sky is not falling.   

And while my unofficial count has the various “I stand with Phil” petitions at roughly 323, I’m not interested in creating another platform for anyone to “like”. 

Similarly when Al Mohler  and Russ Moore offer commentary on a topic,
I’m not sure there’s anything of substance to add. 

So as Phil Robertson’s situation continues to galvanize both the thoughtful and rash, my concern is simply the way forward.  For those who seek to be people of the Book, how are we to operate in an increasing darkened society?

Along these lines, I’d like to offer four thoughts from the book of Isaiah.  
Four reflections on proclaiming divine revelation in a hostile culture:

Bind up the testimony; seal the teaching among my disciples.  I will wait for the Lord...I will hope in him…when they say to you, “inquire of the mediums and necromancers who chirp and mutter,” should not a people inquire of their God?  Should they inquire of the dead on behalf of the living?  To the teaching and to the testimony!  If they will not speak accordingly to this word, it is because they have no dawn (8:16-22).

Isaiah was bound to the Word: Bind up the testimony (16)

We are bound by a clear reading of the text.  Stretching interpretive norms to accommodate societal cravings and whims is the definitive step toward destruction.  Whether the text is obtrusive or deemed outdated, divine revelation stands.  We are bound.     

Moving forward, be bound by the Word even in the complexities of our culture.  In our affection for Christ, how are we to encourage those in our church who are seeking to honor God but still struggle with same sex attraction?    

Be sure, these are part of our body.  Brothers and sisters who love Christ deeply and desire to submit their sexuality to the revealed Word.  Yes, we may find their struggle confusing but this is never license for crass, insensitive language or dismissive, crude humor.  Yes, we may find comfort by championing stories where heterosexual attraction is restored.  And while these stories certainly exist and should be celebrated, there are also stories of ongoing struggle, perseverance, and waiting for Christ's ultimate return.    

Moving forward, may we be a place where people are bound by the Word and freed to follow Christ.  Whatever our sinful impulses might be, however close they might feel to our essential makeup, these sins are covered by Christ's blood and the Spirit will grant grace to obey.  I have a great deal of respect for men and women who struggle with same sex attraction yet maintain faithful obedience to the Word.  Think about it.  With denominations altering Scripture and accommodating the masses, how easy would it be to drift into another fellowship?  How easy would it be to join a group that pacified this base temptation? 

The complexities of sin are many.  These have chosen celibacy in their efforts to pursue their Creator and like the rest of us who fight temptation and seek to live honorably before God - our reward will be great.

Isaiah was to hope in the Word: I will wait for the Lord, I will hope in him (17-18) 

Amid cultural apathy, the prophet waited for the Lord to honor His word.  Rather than drifting off course, Isaiah was resolute in his stance.  Moral relativism has all but destroyed societal mores and those who preach moral absolutes are often held in contempt.  All the while, we actively wait. 

Active to uphold the banner of truth.
Active to stand as a sign of hope to the wayward (18)
Active to love those who do not think as I think.
Active in upholding the gospel of Christ.  

Isaiah was to direct people to the Word: To the teaching and the testimony (19-20a)

As his culture began to seek answers to the pressing questions of their day, Isaiah had but one solution: the Living God.  Note the people's request.  They wanted Isaiah to practice pagan norms for finding authoritative meaning.  They wanted the prophet of God to reduce himself to the mediums who babbled to the dead, 'chirping' for a definitive word.  Isaiah's response?  Why seek the dead when your God is living?  Why seek the lower forms of authority, go to God's teaching and testimony!  

Various pulpits may indeed reduce themselves to popular avenues for authoritative meaning.  But Isaiah’s charge is singular, to faithfully direct the people to the testimony of God.  The Living Creator had clearly spoken, why turn to man's musings?

Isaiah was to uphold the weight of divine revelation: They have no dawn (20b-22).

Should the masses not “speak according to the divine word”, should they not align themselves with sacred revelation, “it is because they have no dawn”.  The reading is clear.  Trifling with divine revelation is a somber offense.
_______

Let us be 'Happy, Happy, Happy'.
For our eternal hope is not a matter of public opinion.  
Though the flower fades and the grass withers the Word of God will stand.   
As we move forward, be mindful of God's charge to Isaiah:  
  • Be unapologetically bound to Scripture.  
  • Be hopeful, God will be faithful to His word.  Waiting for the final Day, use Robertson's story as conversation starter.  Everyone has an opinion on the situation.  Opportunities to share the gospel abound. 
  • Be bold.  Our culture is seeking rest, joyfully proclaim truth!  Don’t be afraid to speak God's truth, pointing people to His timeless testimony. 
  • Be prayerfully wary.  There are those who willfully stray from divine revelation, be careful not to follow for their path.  
Blessings

Thursday, December 12, 2013

The Immanuel Prophecy: A Sign of Hope for the Nations



Priceless.  
  
Unto us a child is born, to us a son is given...
Love the baby’s head poking out of the bundle
And the government will be upon his shoulders...
Love the jerry-curled dude with the broad shoulders 
And his name shall be called...
Love the IPhones
Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace...
Love the Everlasting Gobstopper at the bottom

Even if Isaiah's original manuscripts were somehow located, 
my son's rendition will always be way more valuable!

Hope for the Nations.

If you were to illustrate Isaiah 9, what would you come up with?  
For me, the only thing my son lacks is a globe.    
Isaiah’s clear.  The birth of Immanuel is for all nations.

Read 9:3-7
"You have multiplied the nation; you have increased its joy;
they rejoice before you as with joy at the harvest,
as they are glad when they divide the spoil"  (9:3)
To which nation is Isaiah referring?  While other word choices were available, words that would convey a strict ethnic definition, the prophet was purposeful in his selection.  He chose a word for 'nation' that carried a broad bandwidth, one that would clearly reach beyond ethnic boarders and open a path for all people.1 

Isaiah's point is clear.

Immanuel would be the revelatory light bursting into darkness.
His person and message would carry the definitive word of hope.
He alone would be the impetus for God's new nation,
a people not defined by ethnicity but united in faith and joy.

Isaiah 9 lists three reasons for this new nation to rejoice:
  • Joy to the nation: Immanuel will cause oppression to cease (4)
  • Joy to the nation: Immanuel will cause all fighting to cease (5)
  • Joy to the nation: Immanuel will be the Great King (6-7)
Note four brief observations in 9:6-7.

The child’s birth is announced.  For to us a child is born and a son is given – who is included in the us? In keeping with Isaiah’s international focus, I’d suggest that this royal birth announcement is for all peoples.   

Recall Jesus’ birth narrative. 

Two very distinct people groups were supernaturally brought to Bethlehem: the Jewish shepherds and the Eastern magi.  Jew and Gentile.  Through angelic chorus and shining star the Father brought representatives of these two separate nations to the manger.  In Jesus' story, all nations paid homage.   

Immanuel was sent to you, He was sent to me.  
Unto us, people of every tribe and tongue, a child is born.

The child’s nature is addressed.  Read the names.  Wonderful Counselor.  Mighty God.  Everlasting Father.  Prince of Peace.  The names themselves point to the divine essence and function of Immanuel but I invite you to consider something even more fundamentally unique. 

Jewish kings never got cool nicknames.  While surrounding pagan kings regularly assumed divine monikers this never happened in Israel.  Jewish kings were not allowed to take upon themselves divine status – they knew better. 

With this in mind, Isaiah’s naming of the child leaps off the page.  The prophet intentionally attributed divinity to this coming infant.  And while the pagan kings may boast of god like status, this Immanuel child would stand-alone. 

Unequivocally, He is the god-man.

The child’s heritage is affirmed.  By referencing David’s throne, Isaiah points directly to the central fulfillment of redemptive history.  Isaiah affirms that David’s heir would rule for eternity, the covenants made with the forefathers would prevail (2 Samuel 7; Isaiah 6:13; 11:1-9, 10-16). 

God is a promise keeper.

The child’s future is assured.  If given a chance to peek into the manger, what might we have seen? 

A baby fast asleep. 
Possibly a tiny head bobbing awkwardly, rooting for sustenance. 
Maybe a reddish face, concocting a pasty-yellow disaster. 

Whatever the case, be assured, this child would not fail. 

I love the end of verse 7.  
“The zeal of the Lord of hosts will do this.” 
Zeal.  The word even sounds aggressive. 
From of the depths of divine passion, the infant would succeed.  
The mission would be fulfilled, the zeal of the Most High would see to it.  
_________

This Christmas, take time to read Isaiah 7:1-9:7.
Take time to sit with the sign. 
And may our faith be filled with Immanuel's might.

For He alone has the power to save. Through the faithful obedience of Immanuel, Israel fulfilled her mission to mediate truth and salvation to the nations. Jesus became the faithful high priest, ministering to the nations.

For He alone has the power to unite. As Immanuel embodied and taught reconciliation, let us be leading to address the interpersonal fragmentation of our society. Rather than passively adhere to cultural norms, the church has the power to speak toward all manner of racial, gender, economic, and generational tensions.

For He alone has the power to comfort. Jesus battled temptation, suffered loss, wrestled with His circumstances, and questioned the Father - He understands. Our Faithful High Priest assumed flesh and is willing to come alongside and offer perspective, energy, and grace.

Blessings!  


1.  For those lexicon types...the term Isaiah used for 'nation' in 9:3 is ‘goy’ a generic term as opposed to ‘yam’ a term emphasizing an ethnically defined border; also note plural of they - 2x

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

The Immanuel Prophecy: A Sign of Hope for the Nations


I enjoy good signage. 
This one especially caught my attention.  
Free espresso and a free puppy.
  
Signs communicate. 
They tell us what to expect. 
They give pertinent information. 

Read the Sign.  When Isaiah delivered the Immanuel prophecy he drove a massive sign into the landscape of redemptive history, a marker that would anchor humanity's hope into this coming child (7:14).1     

The sign reads, God will visit His people for salvation.
The sign reads, this child will fulfill ancient covenants.  
The sign reads, God's glory will fill the earth.
The sign reads, this child will bring hope to all nations.     
  
Signs are all around. 
Some more prominent, some more pertinent.
But no sign has been more revolutionary than the one Isaiah staked.  
God would become flesh.  

Don't miss this.  Our eternal hope passed through a birth canal.  

And while Isaiah introduces this incredibly earthy event, he intentionally injects the prophecy with a distinct international flare.  This child would be for all peoples
  • A Sign of Hope for the Nations: A Light will Shine in Galilee (9:1-2)   
  • A Sign of Hope for the Nations: Unto Us A Child is Born (9:3-7)
A Light will Shine in Galilee 

Up until 734, literally nothing had happened. 
Certainly the prophet Isaiah railed against the throne but nothing changed.
Seemingly the nation of Judah had skirted divine wrath.
Oh, the difference a year can make. 

By 735 BC Assyrian forces had begun their march southward into the northern most Israeli territory.  Using this foreign powerhouse, God was positioning Himself to utterly level His people.  And while Isaiah has much to say concerning the divine purpose of Assyria, the point of Isaiah 9:1-2 is not to create dread but hope.

Read Isaiah 9:1-2.

Zebulun and Naphtali, the two northern most territories of Israel.
These two lands were part of one region, the region of Galilee. 

Galilee would be geographically unique on two fronts:
As the first Jewish region cursed with Assyrian occupation, 
Galilee was the first to drink divine wrath,
As the first Jewish region blessed by divine revelation, 
Galilee was the first to hear of divine deliverance.

According to Isaiah, Galilee was glorious in this distinction.
To her and her alone would the divine light first be revealed.

Make the connection with me.  Note Isaiah 9:1-2 along with Matthew 4:12-17.  The divine light of revelation was made known to the region of Galilee by both Jesus’ presence and His message.

Galilee was the first to receive divine revelation from the Immanuel child.
Galilee was the first to hear, 'repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand'. 

Isaiah nailed it.  Prophesying some 500 years prior to Jesus’ preaching in Galilee, Isaiah was spot on geographically.  But there's more.  As if the prophecy weren’t amazing enough, note the wording of 9:1.  Of special interest is exactly to whom this geographical blessing is associated, Galilee of the Gentiles.

Galilee of the Gentiles.  Intensified by the Assyrian conquest, Galilee had become an odd mix of foreign peoples and practices.2  By Isaiah’s estimation Galilee had become defined by Gentile occupation.  

Interestingly Immanuel would visit Galilee precisely because she was defined by this Gentile occupation.  For Isaiah the glory of Galilee was that God would actually visit the Gentiles.3 

The greatest shock of Isaiah 9:1-2 isn’t the prophetic word dealing with geographical boundaries but the prophetic word dealing with national boundaries.  The Immanuel child would somehow and in someway be associated with the Gentiles.  

Read the Sign.  Whatever else Immanuel would become, for Isaiah this child would be for the nations.  

Amid the scandal of Isaiah's contemporaries, amid their whorish bent toward spiritual infidelity - God would not abandon His eternal purpose.  And while we understanding God did redeem the nations through Immanuel, let us not grow cold by presuming He would.  

May God grant us grace to slow down and savor the promise of Immanuel.  Grace to see the neon sign pointing to the Father's love.  Grace to sense that in God's eternal plan this child offers hope to all peoples and nations. 

May we read and rejoice - for unto us was born in the City of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.       


Blessings.  




 1.  Ahaz’s rejection of God’s divine rule and authority led to Isaiah clearly spells out that God would ‘be with’ Judah for judgment (7:1-8:10, note Maher-shalal-hashbaz).  Yet as quickly as Isaiah declares destruction upon David’s house, he delivers an undeniable message of hope.  God would uniquely visit His people for salvation, through the Immanuel child God would ‘be with’ His people for restoration. Indeed, for Isaiah the hope of the nations rested solely upon the future of this Immanuel child (9:1-12:6). 

2.  Well before the Assyrian conquest, the northern boarder region of Galilee was inundated with outside influence.  They’d become a virtual melting pot of foreign ideologies, customs, and religious practices – a state that only intensified following the Assyrian takeover. 

Per Assyrian military policy, portions of the indigenous people group would be deported into various regions of kingdom while their fallen homeland would then receive other indigenous peoples that had been conquered by Assyria. 

Effectually, the shuffling of indigenous people groups from one region to the next would serve to break them of their national spirit thus making revolt less probable.

3.  Note the ESV footnote for 'Galilee of the nations', it eludes to the Gentile focus.