Stop and Think

"It sort of makes you stop and think doesn't it"

Recently I came across an article written by Robert Lupton entitled "Asking the Right Questions About Serving".  I highly recommend it to anyone considering local or global ministry initiatives.  Essentially it addresses and informs the "whys and hows" of our Christian service.

Should the principles within the article interest you, might I also suggest that you read the book "When Helping Hurts" by Steve Corbett and Brian Fikkert.  I'm using the aforementioned text in an elective for our church beginning July 22nd, great book concerning gospel centered social engagement.    

Below are some of the article's "take aways" :

A few suggestions to avoid mission toxicity.  Mission projects can be genuinely redemptive.  The best ones are joint ventures with mature, indigenous ministries that understand both the culture and healthy cross-cultural partnering.  A few reality-tested principles provide a “code of conduct” to guide invited volunteer guests toward sensitive, mutually transforming relationships:

•  Never do for others what they can do for themselves (teach a man to fish).

•  Limit one-way giving to emergencies (most needs are chronic, not crisis).

•  Employment, lending, investing are best (use grants sparingly as incentives).

•  Subordinate self-interests to the interests of the poor (is this for our good or theirs?).

•  Listen to what is not being said (many needs are not immediately voiced).

•  Above all, do no harm.

Grace and Peace


http://communitiesfirstassociation.org/2012/07/03/asking-the-right-questions-about-serving/

Another African American President, The Pulpit, and the Status Quo

Glad to see the Southern Baptist Convention voted in Fred Luter as its first black president. On many levels this would seem encouraging, if not monumental. I suppose to a certain extent I agree. 

Still yet, the answer to the ongoing fragmentation of the evangelical church will not be found in a man that serves a one year term - the answer rests in the much less glamourous position of the pastorate.

In the pulpit, specifically through the teaching of the Word, is where hope truly rests. Through captivating minds around the grand narrative of scripture the church will find both the rationale and motivation to break down the systematic, cooperate sin that she often unwittingly perpetuates.

I once heard a pastor say that racially homogenous churches are simply a cultural phenomena that leadership must simply deal with.

Reading between the lines: blacks will be with blacks and whites will be with whites, cultures gravitate toward on another and instead of sifting through the historical and varied motivations for such fragmentation - just deal with it. Lead existing churches to tow this line. Plant new churches that will preserve this line. After all the main mission is to see souls saved.

The preacher casually shrugged this perpetuation off as if it were not in fact a gospel issue, insinuating that he could continue to proclaim the gospel from the pulpit while allowing systematic racism and cultural elitism to persist in the pew.

While there is much that could be said to the ongoing diminishment of the good news - I couldn't say it any better than these guys so I won't try. This link doesn't cover the entire issue but it does a wonderful job of touching on the high notes.http://www.desiringgod.org/resource-library/conference-messages/race-and-the-christian#/watch/full

Men, lead well.

Celebrate Luter's momentary platform but realize that it is the platform of the pulpit that will actually see the gospel's power come to fruition throughout the church.

Grace and Peace

City Life

“Why The City Is A Good Place to Raise Children”    

Nice article.  The author, Kathy Keller, is a resident of New York City.  Her husband is Tim Keller, pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian and popular Christian writer.  And while the ministry of the Keller family is well documented, Springfield is a far cry from the Big Apple. 

Many of the practical benefits referenced in her publication simply don’t translate.  In fact, I’d say 95% of the advantages Kathy listed wouldn’t be experienced in Springfield, OH.  We are after all, warranted or not, the saddest city in America two years running. 

Even so, the article does generate thought.  Keller contends that children benefit from being exposed to city life, specifically the stark contrast offered between light and darkness.  I tend to agree with her.  Cities of all sizes are wonderful tools of both education and spiritual formation in that they paint clear pictures of brokenness, grace, mercy, and redemption.  

This raises a question.  What does an urban context afford families who are seeking to intentionally raise kingdom-centered kids?  This isn't necessarily an issue of where God calls your family to reside.  Wherever He may place you, your residence at this point is secondary.  Consider the unique benefits of your family investing in an urban church:  

• How could the city actually be a spiritual asset your family?  Put another way, what lessons can your family learn from the city that can't be caught elsewhere?   

• What are some challenges of investing in an urban church?  How is my family prepared to be an agent of change?  

• How am I stewarding this resource for the development of my family? 

I’ve said it before.  Southgate Baptist Church reminds me of the Antique Roadshow.   You may be familiar with the program.  People have unique and priceless treasure buried in their attic.  They bring the items to the Roadshow only to discover that the pieces are worth thousands.  

I would contend that the physical location of Southgate is spiritually priceless but it has heretofore been treated much like a treasure in the attic.  We know its there but we’ve no idea of its value in the spiritual formation of our families.

Opportunities such as these can be unbelievably squandered.  The effects of racism and classism upon the church can be easily noted – it need not be this way.  There are deeper expressions of missional living that need both explored and championed. 

Whether you’re driving in from the burbs, the fields, or the city  – there is work to be done.  There are tangible opportunities for our families to both demonstration and declare the gospel of Hope and Peace in this present darkness.    

I’d love to hear back from you.  Call, email, or post a reply. 
Either way, I’d love to keep the dialogue moving. 

Grace and Peace

Link to Keller's article: 

http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/02/15/why-the-city-is-a-wonderful-place-to-raise-children/

The Boys and Their Toys

I’m pretty sure the arms race is fueled from our attic.

The playroom contains an arsenal.  Ninja stars, light sabers, battle-axes, katana blades, Nerf sniper guns, crossbows, Transformer blasters, nunchucks, glocks, pirate swords, batarangs, tridents, reported nukes…

You need it – the boys have it. 

They have it and they’ve tested it. 

Our walls display daily reminders of these epic battles.  

Finally, enough was enough.  Over the weekend I set out to right the wrongs.  Armed with a single sponge brush I was determined to touch up EVERY ding and scuffmark. 

If only it were that easy. 

Better lighting afforded closer examination. 

The scuffmarks had scuffmarks, 

collateral damage in their ongoing skirmish.

Yet while painting I was reminded: with better Lighting comes the realization we bear the marks of warfare. 

We’ve still got scuffmarks.  The subtleties of our rebellion leave their mark and the further we draw into Christ the more unnerving this truth becomes.  No matter how faithfully we’ve walked with God - He is ever calling us into greater depths of communion.  He is still at work in our soul.  And the unbelievable news is that God’s grace not only saves, it sustains.  It transforms.

Know this.  Greater than the shame, guilt, and regret is this truth: God is faithful to complete the work He began (Philippians 1:6).  The very Spirit of Christ will empower us such that our interest in and capacity for righteous obedience will radically deepen.  Indeed, as we submit to our Father varying degrees of Christ’s glory will begin to shine through us as we seek to walk as Christ walked (2 Corinthians 3:17-18; I John 2:6). 

Whatever battle may have beset you, press on.  Whatever sin might be of particular challenge, persevere.  Get up and make the hard choice.  Choose to walk in the light as He is in the light.  It is certainly not with flesh and blood that we strive.  Nevertheless, be assured of our eternal Advocate.  His voice drowns our Enemy.  And as our Accuser has no heavenly audience, let us also turn a deaf ear for in Christ we have been forgiven (I John 2:1; Revelation 12:10). We are freed to follow.

Grace and Peace.

Along these lines, I recommend the current sermon series being preached by Bobby Hile - Walk in the Light.  It is an expositional study of I John and since he’s only three weeks in you’re not too late to follow! 

What Not to Wear: Reflections on I Corinthians 15

What are you wearing?

My sense of style is simply deficient.  I have never retained the rules of proper attire. I would wear white all year long. Or anything stained, ripped and mismatched.   I wear corduroy in July until my wife has to hide it from me.  If I am just running to the grocery, who cares?  And if I am just running out to the car – rules do not apply.  Ask my neighbors.  Picture Cousin Eddie greeting neighbors in his bathrobe, slippers, trooper hat, and boxers. 

I do draw a line at the boxers, but the rest of the picture is me.

I’ve been somewhat of a ten-year project for Janna.  What I now concede is that certain attire matches certain occasions.  There are casual, relaxed, and refined occasions.  And while attending said occasion, it is preferable that one’s attire does in fact relate to it.

Indeed, proper attire is required. 

Paul closes I Corinthians 15 with this fundamental idea (15:35-58).[1]  As Adam’s children, our natural bodies simply cannot withstand all God has purposed for us in His manifested kingdom (15:50; I Tim 6:16).  “Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable put on the imperishable.” 

We await a fundamental wardrobe change.  We look forward to an epic makeover, one for the ages: “this perishable body must put on the imperishable and this mortal body must put on immortality.”  Our physical bodies, corrupted by sin, are incapable of housing the incorruptible. We are in desperate need of an altogether different kind of wardrobe, a glorious flesh that is quite different in its constitution and capacity. 

Paul resolves the material-spiritual tension not by dismissing bodily resurrection but by introducing a secret: Behold!  I tell you a mystery.  We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed. The faithful will undergo a complete transformation.  The result will be perfection, a reveal more astounding than anything ever seen on TLC.

As the final trumpet sounds, the fullness of Christ’s victory over death will be evident as all the redeemed of all ages “put on” the imperishable.  No longer bound by the natural body but freed to experience the fullness of God’s intent: harmony of both spiritual and physical existence. 

As we put on our Easter best, let us reflect on our future attire. 

The grave couldn’t hold our Lord.  Evil has been vanquished.  God’s eternal intent secured through an empty tomb.  I Corinthians 15 bursts with hope.  Let us then be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that in the Lord our labor is not in vain (58).

Grace and Peace

---

[1]  The idea of “proper attire” gives shape to I Corinthians 15:35-58.  Those influenced by Greek thought scoffed at the resurrection of the dead (35).  Driving an unnecessary hierarchy between the material and spiritual realms, the Greeks had little use for material existence.  Our bodies were thought to be a temporal necessity awaiting liberation.  Paul doesn’t entirely disagree with his opponents; he only challenges their conclusion.  Indeed, the tension they felt was accurate.  Paul himself affirmed that flesh and blood couldn’t entertain the magnitude of the spiritual realm.  Yet instead of abandoning the future resurrection Paul advances two thoughts:

1. Reflection on creation demonstrates noticeable difference (37-49):
• As there are in creation different types of flesh (humans, animals, birds, and fish), our resurrected body will be of a different type (39)
• As there are in creation different levels of glory (terrestrial and celestial), our resurrected body will be of a different level (40-41) 
• So it is with the resurrection of the dead: a different type of flesh with a different glory.  Paul assured that we would bare the image of Christ (42-49)
2. Introduction of a great mystery, we will all be changed (50-58)
• Affirming the problem – introducing the solution (50-53)
• Demonstrating the fullness of Christ’s victory (54-57)
• Exhorting continued faithfulness (58) 

Eat, Drink and Die or Believe, Act and Live: Reflections on I Corinthians 15

What do people mean by being baptized on behalf of the dead? 

If the dead are not raised why are people baptized on their behalf? 

Why are we in danger every hour?

What do I gain if I fought with beasts at Ephesus? 

If the dead are not raised, “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die

The first section of I Corinthians 15 concludes with these statements.  Having carefully reasoned from Scripture and his apostolic authority (15:3-28), Paul shifts the focus of his discourse from rational argumentation to experiential persuasion (15:29-32).

From his own experience, Paul begs a question: What’s the point?  If there is no hope in experiencing a future resurrected state, then Why Bother?  Without the resurrection of the dead, our sole recourse would be the pursuit of temporal pleasure  - to eat and drink, for tomorrow we die (15:32).  Yet, as Paul will contend, it is precisely because there is a future resurrection that we should be motivated to act. 

To establish his point, Paul offers two case studies.  The first appears to be a small religious sect the second is Paul himself.   

The Sect (15:29):

The perplexing nature of verse 29 makes this passage one of controversy.  The simple reading of the text shows that certain people were practicing vicarious baptism for the dead [1].  While inquiring minds might want to know more, there simply aren’t any 1^st century biblical or extra biblical writings to give us a clue.  All that can be known is found in 15:29. 

Paul’s point is clear.  The sect’s belief in a future resurrection correctly motivated them to action.  Paul neither condones nor condemns the action they chose; he simply observes the consistent behavior that one’s belief must motivate to some manner of action.  Conviction without action is inexcusable complacency.  It was their belief in the future resurrection of the dead that led them to institute a nuanced baptismal rite.  Right or wrong, they acted.  This impassioned connection of conviction-motivation-action drew Paul’s attention [2]. 

The Apostle Paul (15:30-32):

Paul’s own conviction spurred him to action.  The grounded assurance that he would join Jesus in His victorious, resurrected state motivated Paul .

A casual reading of Acts and the Pauline epistles reveals that martyrdom was part of Paul’s routine.  Living on the edge of death he asked, “What do I gain…if the dead are not raised?”  What’s the point in risking my life? 

If there is no resurrection of the dead, then why order life accordingly?  If there is no future benefit to living a consistent life – why bother?  Why not eat, drink, and be merry if tomorrow we die?  Epitomize the essence of hedonistic living.  Dive headlong into the “best” this world has to offer.

What exactly is the point? 

Paul uses his life as a tutorial (15:30-32).  He encourages his fellow followers of Christ to “do as I do” (4:16-17; 11:1, 15:29-32) and “follow me as I follow Christ”. Paul champions consistent living, a life governed and ordered by true convictions.  If we are convinced of the resurrection of the dead, then we must act like it. 

Conviction without action is inexcusable.  Faith without works is dead. With two imperatives, Paul confidently calls the church to imitate him:

·      Do not be deceived.  Bad company corrupts good morals.  While this charge could be applied to many situations, textually it deals solely with the expectation of a future resurrection.  Do those we spend significant time with heighten or dampen our resolve to live in hope of the resurrection?  Do they inspire us to see the risen Lord? 

·      Wake up.  Get in the game!  Stop sinning and start sharing the good news of Christ.  The deceitful nature of sin will ensnare even the most passionate soul if it is not kept vigilant.  Stop sinning and live missionally.  Get your head up and get involved in the work of His kingdom.  

Next Sunday is Easter weekend.  With Paul, let’s reflect upon the passion and the mission of our lives, prayerfully considering his charge in I Corinthians 15:29-34.  Let’s walk, live, love, think, speak, feel, work, and act in a manner worthy of our calling.  Worthy of the resurrected glory that is imminent for us who are called heavenward in Christ Jesus. 

Grace and Peace

[1] A standard rule for interpreting scripture is that the simple reading of the text is usually the preferred reading of the text.  If one’s interpretation relies heavily upon lexical coaxing and speculation beyond the author’s written words, chances are the interpretation is stretching to fit a predetermined idea.

[2] If asked, Paul would most certainly condemn the notion that the living could mystically transfer future benefit to the dead via baptism.  If prevalent within the church he likely would have expounded on the topic.  Nevertheless, he seemingly chose to reflect on their consistent behavior: conviction of future resurrection led them to action.  For a different perspective on verse 29: http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2011/04/22/baptism-for-the-dead

The Rest of the Story...

‘There is no resurrection of the dead’, they said.  Paul would have none of that foolish talk.  To whatever extent this popular ideology captivated the Corinth church; it clearly drew Paul’s impassioned response [1].  Consider the following portions of I Corinthians 15:

If Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain.

If Christ has not been raised, then your faith is in vain.

If Christ has not been raised, then your faith is futile.

If Christ has not been raised, then you are still in your sins.

With the obvious weight and attention Paul gives Resurrection Sunday in chapter 15 a thought crossed my mind.  I began to wonder what kind of movie review he would give The Passion of Christ? 

I remember coming to its final scene emotionally spent, yet yearning for more. 

Such has been my experience the few times I’ve watched The Passion.  Unlike any artistic medium before it, the film powerfully depicts Good Friday, but inevitably the movie leaves me unfulfilled.  Having plumbed the harsh realities of Jesus’s crucifixion for nearly two hours why not underscore the richness of His ultimate triumph?  Where’s the rest of the story? 

Sure, in the last sixty seconds Christ’s battered corpse materializes into a resurrected state, but immediately the music reaches a crescendo and the credits role.  Directors cut?  Nothing.  No extras, no deleted scenes – nothing.  

I’d like to imagine that Paul would’ve shared my sentiment.

Outside of the gospels I Corinthians 15 is the resurrection passage.  The full work of Christ, from the cross to the empty tomb, is what the prophets predicted, what the early saints evidenced, and what each of the apostles proclaimed (15:3-11).  Yet some had lost sight of God’s grand redemptive purpose.  Instead of holding to the apostolic teaching, some seemingly envisioned man existing eternally in an ethereal state.  Take note of Paul’s response: 

If there be no future bodily existence, then even Christ himself is still dead, and If Christ didn’t raise from the dead (12-13):

·      The message we preach and the message you believed is empty (14)

·      We are false witnesses and God is a liar (15-16)

·      We are still in our sin (17)

·      Those dead in Christ are eternally damned (18)

·      Those alive in Christ are foolish and to be pitied (19)

Christ’s physical death and resurrection enabled God’s plan for mankind to be realized.  To have one without the other would disrupt the divine intent.  Yet there’s more.  For Paul the sum benefit of Christ’s resurrection goes well beyond the singular focus of man’s eternal state.  The text enhances the scope of Christ’s resurrection to an all-together different, cosmic level.    

Good Friday and Resurrection Sunday comprise a singular hope: that God, through Christ, restored and secured creation’s ultimate intent.  Due to Christ’s resurrection, eschatological hope pulsates throughout I Corinthians 15.  The entire chapter peers toward this New Age; an age defined by perfect harmony of the spiritual and physical realm.  Both of these function in unbroken communion and glory to God the Father (15:24-28; 50-57).

We need a big lens by which to read I Corinthians 15.  Christ’s resurrection is the firstfruits of a future where Christ himself will deliver the kingdom to God the Father (15:24).  Cosmic harmony is not only the climax of the gospel but also the very pinnacle of NT theology.  As evidenced in the resurrection of Jesus Christ, God is indeed making all things new.    

As Easter nears, may we be reminded that the gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ extends as far as the curse is found.  The scope of our King’s rule reaches every crevice of creation.  May the spirit of I Corinthians 15 remind us of the hope in which we stand and the truth by which we are being saved (15:1-2).

Grace and Peace

[1] One such idea was the Greek notion that the soul of man, his immaterial essence, was immortal and that the man’s physical body, his material being, was a temporary albeit unfortunate necessity.  From this reasoning two things stood in stark contrast with apostolic teaching.  First, proponents of this viewpoint did not hold to a physical resurrection of the dead (I Corinthians 15:12; Luke 20:27ff; Acts 17:30-32).  Secondly, proponents of this view advanced the idea that bodily sin was, at the very least, tolerable for the material body would pass away.  Conversely, throughout I Corinthians Paul weaves together three interrelated ideas: our body belongs to the Lord, there will be a bodily resurrection, and we will give a physical account for our actions (3:16-17; 5:1-2; 6:12-20; 15:32-34, 58).